Guaranteed Issue Life Insurance: Why Most Buyers Lose Money (And Who Should Still Consider It)

Most people buying guaranteed issue life insurance think they’re buying peace of mind. In reality, many are buying an expensive promise they don’t need, and giving up the chance to build more wealth for their family another way. Guaranteed issue can be the right move for a small group of people, but for most, it is a costly detour.

Below is a narrative look at how these policies actually perform, compared with simply investing the same dollars into a taxable account holding U.S. government bonds yielding 4% per year, with earnings reinvested and a 27% tax rate on interest.

---

Meet Three People: Age 50, 60, and 70

Imagine three people, all considering a $25,000 guaranteed issue life insurance policy:

• Alex, age 50

• Maria, age 60

• James, age 70

All three are being offered “can’t be turned down” coverage from association or credit union programs—think AARP, TruStage, union plans, and similar offerings marketed to older adults. The pitch emphasizes:[trustage]​

• No medical questions

• Easy enrollment

• Lifetime coverage

• “Affordable monthly premium”

What the brochures don’t emphasize is the long-run return on those premiums.

To keep things simple, we’ll use representative premiums drawn from published examples and reviews of guaranteed issue policies around $25,000 of coverage. Actual numbers vary by carrier, sex, and state, but the pattern is consistent.[aarp]​

We’ll compare two paths for each person:

1. Path A – Guaranteed Issue Life Insurance

2. Path B – Invest the Same Premiums in U.S. Government Bonds

   • 4% annual yield

   • Interest taxed at 27% each year (so net 2.92%)

   • Earnings reinvested annually (compounded)

---

Alex, Age 50: “I Should Have Decades Left”

Alex is a reasonably healthy 50‑year‑old who receives a mailer offering $25,000 of guaranteed acceptance life insurance. The marketing is aimed at “locking in final expenses” and “ensuring loved ones are protected.” The policy is similar to AARP-style guaranteed issue coverage.[choicemutual]​

The Offer

• Coverage: $25,000

• Premium (representative): about $948 per year for a 50‑year‑old woman; a bit more for a man[choicemutual]​

• Graded benefit for first 2 years (if Alex dies from natural causes in years 1–2, her beneficiary may only receive a refund of premiums plus about 10%)[nylaarp]​

• Lifetime pay—premiums continue for life

According to recent U.S. life tables, a 50‑year‑old can expect to live roughly 30–32 more years, into the early 80s.[cdc]​

Path A: Guaranteed Issue Life Insurance

We’ll look at what happens if Alex dies at different points in time.

Premium: $948/year, Benefit: $25,000

*These IRRs are conditional on the year of death. At life expectancy, Alex’s likely outcome, the IRR is below zero because she pays more in than her heirs receive.

If Alex dies early, the policy looks like a home run. But she’s 50. Odds are she will live closer to life expectancy than to year 5 or 10. At that point she has:

• Paid more than $30,000 in premiums

• Left only $25,000 behind

She has negative ROI on the death benefit at the most likely horizon.

Path B: Investing in Government Bonds

Instead, imagine Alex puts $948 per year into a taxable account invested in U.S. government bonds:

• Gross yield: 4%

• Tax rate on interest: 27%

• Net yield after tax: 4% × (1 – 0.27) = 2.92%

• Earnings reinvested annually

Her account values over time:

At Alex’s life expectancy (~32 years):

• Account value is roughly the same premium stream she would have paid into the policy, but it grows to almost double the life insurance death benefit.

• Her family gets liquidity that is not locked into a fixed $25,000 cap.

• She can adjust, spend, or redeploy the money during life.

In other words, at Alex’s age, the bonds beat guaranteed issue on expected value and flexibility. The policy only “wins” if she dies too early to enjoy the results.

---

Maria, Age 60: “Final Expense” Years Begin

Maria is 60, closer to retirement, and worries about being a burden to her children. She gets offers from credit union and association programs (TruStage, AARP) for guaranteed issue final expense coverage.[riskquoter]​

The Offer

Representative TruStage-style numbers for a 60‑year‑old man buying $25,000:[trustage]​

• Coverage: $25,000

• Premium: about $2,124 per year (roughly $177/month for a male; females pay less but the structure is similar)

• Graded benefit in first 2 years

• Lifetime pay

Life expectancy at 60 is roughly 20 more years, into the late 70s or around 80.[cdc]​

Path A: Guaranteed Issue Life Insurance

Premium: $2,124/year, Benefit: $25,000

By year 10, the IRR has already fallen to low single digits. By year 15, Maria’s family is behind. At her expected lifespan (about 20 years), she has paid nearly twice the benefit.

Path B: Investing in Government Bonds

Now assume Maria invests $2,124 per year into U.S. government bonds at 4%, taxed at 27% (net 2.92%), with reinvested interest.

At Maria’s life expectancy (~20 years), the investment account would be worth more than $57,000, over double the guaranteed issue death benefit, with similar total cash outlay over time.

Again, the only way the guaranteed issue contract “wins” is if Maria dies relatively soon after starting it. If she lives like an average 60‑year‑old, the bond strategy clearly dominates in terms of wealth transferred to heirs.

---

James, Age 70: “Now It Gets Interesting”

James is 70. At this age, longevity is shorter, and guaranteed issue math becomes more nuanced.

Many guaranteed issue policies at 70 still:

• Cap coverage around $10,000–$25,000

• Charge high premiums

• Have graded benefits in years 1–2

But because James is expected to live around 15 more years (into his mid‑80s), the break-even period is closer.[cdc]​

The Offer

Representative guaranteed issue pricing scaled from AARP and other final expense products for a 70‑year‑old buying $25,000:[matador-insurance]​

• Coverage: $25,000

• Premium: around $2,400–$2,700 per year (depending on sex, carrier, and state)

Let’s assume $2,500/year for round numbers.

Path A: Guaranteed Issue Life Insurance

Premium: $2,500/year, Benefit: $25,000

For James, if the real probability is that he will live 15+ more years, the expected IRR again trends negative. The policy only offers strong ROI if he dies in the first 5–8 years.

Path B: Investing in Government Bonds

Now assume James invests $2,500 per year in the same bond strategy (4% yield, 27% tax, net 2.92%):

At year 10, his account is already worth more than the life insurance death benefit. At year 15 (around his life expectancy), his heirs could receive nearly $47,000 instead of $25,000, using about the same annual outlay.

Again, the only scenario where guaranteed issue provides a better payoff is if James dies well before expectation.

---

The Common Thread: Most People Overpay

In all three stories, the pattern is the same:

• If death comes early, guaranteed issue looks fantastic. The IRR on the death benefit can be very high in the first few years.

• If life follows the averages, cumulative premiums catch up to—or exceed—the death benefit. At that point, guaranteed issue delivers a low or negative financial return, especially compared with a simple, boring bond strategy.

On top of this:

• There is usually a two‑year graded period where natural‑cause deaths do not pay the full benefit.[funeraladvantage]​

• Many buyers at 50 or 60 could qualify for better‑priced underwritten or simplified‑issue coverage, but never try, because the guaranteed issue ad found them first.[policygenius]​

That’s why this corner of the market is one most people should avoid, or at least approach with extreme caution. In practice, many are paying $25,000–$40,000 over their lifetime to leave $25,000 behind—a poor trade when other options exist.

---

Who Actually Should Consider Guaranteed Issue?

Despite all the negatives, there is a meaningful minority for whom guaranteed issue can be very valuable:

• People who have been declined for underwritten coverage multiple times

• Those with serious, advanced chronic conditions and limited life expectancy

• Individuals who have no savings and no realistic path to build enough for burial and final expenses

• Older buyers (often 70+) whose physicians are candid that the likely horizon is shorter than what the tables say

For them, guaranteed issue can be a humane, practical way to:

• Lock in a small but certain death benefit

• Protect their families from needing to borrow money or crowdfund a funeral

• Do something responsible when no other insurance options remain

But that is a narrow set of people—not the average 50‑ or 60‑year‑old responding to mailers.

---

Why You Should Review This With a Planner Before You Buy

Guaranteed issue life insurance is one of those product categories where most buyers will either lose money or grossly overpay for what they’re getting, while a small minority get exactly what they need at a critical time in life.

The hard part is knowing which side you’re on.

A financial planner who is also licensed to sell life insurance can help you:

• Run the actual math: map out total premiums vs. death benefit at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, and at your realistic life expectancy.

• Compare to an investment path: such as a simple bond strategy like the one above to see what your heirs are likely to receive in each case.

• Explore alternatives: underwritten term or permanent coverage, group or portable coverage, simplified‑issue policies, or non‑insurance solutions.

• Match your health picture to the right tool: recognizing when guaranteed issue is truly the “only game in town” versus when it’s just the first ad that showed up in your mailbox.

For a small group of people, guaranteed issue is a smart, compassionate solution. For most, it is an expensive way to solve a problem they could handle more efficiently with other tools.

Before you sign an application, take the time to sit with someone who will treat it as a planning decision—not a product sale—and make sure the numbers, not just the emotions, support the choice.